Centre pertaining to English Language Communication
National College or university of Singapore
ES1541 Discovering Science Conversation through Well-known Science Article 5
Writing Peer Assessment Reports
Assignment 3: Two Peer Review Reports 10%
Write two peer assessment reports for the essay assignment for the 2 peers assigned to you. The review statement should be crafted as a idiota to your instructor and include a shorter summary with the arguments inside the essay, a piece devoted to key critiques, an area to minimal critiques. You will also need to provide a mark within the two works you have left a comment on, depending on the rubric provided to you personally. Each statement should be around 150 words and phrases long.
Advantages of Peer Assessment
Many specialists find peer reviews of their work very useful as these suggest different views and provide beneficial feedback upon what is compelling and precisely what is problematic in a piece of writing. The most obvious benefit of expert review is the fact it provides you a wider audience, that provides you the possibility to receive opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of your own composing, thereby helping you to improve your article. However , reviewing your peer's writing also helps you to
acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of your writing after reading and responding to one other paper. figure out how to critically analyze your personal writing plus the writing more develop a higher sense of and sensitivity to viewers.
find out new details from your peers' papers.
become familiarized with the format, style, criteria, and expectations of writing inside the discipline analyzed
Because of these benefits for both the conventional paper writer and his/her peer reviewers, executing peer evaluations and producing peer assessment reports have almost almost always been an essential part of the process writing pedagogy.
Publishing a Critical Assessment
Format of the Review Project: Use of a Memorandum
" Memorandum" (or " Memo" ) generally appears in bold characters either left- or center-justified at the top of the page. You can include the following data for the memo to your review survey:
Subject: (or Lso are: )
Purpose of a Critical Assessment
The important review can be described as writing task that demands you to summarize and evaluate a text message. Writing the critical assessment usually requires you to see the selected textual content in detail and probably to also examine other related texts so that you can present a fair and reasonable analysis of the selected text. Precisely what is meant by simply critical?
Being critical does not mean to criticize in a adverse manner. Somewhat it requires one to question the info and opinions in a textual content and present your analysis or view of the text message. To do this well, make an attempt to understand the topic from diverse perspectives (i. e. go through related texts). What is supposed by evaluation or wisdom?
Here you choose the strengths and weaknesses of your text. To describe it in based on certain criteria (see our rubrics for marking essays and book reviews). Evaluating needs an understanding of not just the content of the text, but as well an understanding of your text's goal, and for what reason it is structured the way it really is. Structure of your Critical Assessment
The introduction can be quite a very small passage, which includes a couple of opening sentences that declare the author and the title, and briefly describe the topic of the written text. Present the goal of the text and summarize the important thing argument. Conclude the intro with a simple statement of your evaluation from the text. This is often a positive or perhaps negative analysis or, ones own usually the truth, a combined response. Overview
Present a brief summary from the key points and also a limited range of examples. You can also briefly explain the author's purpose/intentions through the entire text and you might briefly identify how the textual content is prepared. Major Reviews
The major critiques will be directed to issues on articles...
References: Greene, S. (2001). The question of authenticity: Teaching writing in a first-year school history of technology class. Analysis in the Instructing of English, 35(4): 525-569.
Reid, L. M. (2000). The process of composition (3rd ed. ). White colored Plains, NEW YORK: Prentice-Hall Regent.
Mort, P., Hallion, T., & Robert downey, T. T. (2005). Producing a critical assessment. The University of New Southern region Wales: The training Centre. Reached on a few August 2013 from http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/onlib/pdf/critical_review.pdf